From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with SMTP id p36IUdnC048480 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:30:40 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id D5D073AD672 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id BEPpnENL0Qg0fLBz for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:33:56 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] xfs: push the AIL from memory reclaim and periodic sync Message-ID: <20110406183356.GA23275@infradead.org> References: <1302070758-17312-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1302070758-17312-8-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1302070758-17312-8-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com The patch looks correct, but I wonder what the performance implications of flushing the AIL every 30 seconds are. Did you benchmark the patchset to see what it does to performance numbers for metadata intensive workloads? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs