From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with SMTP id p37HG6wN120166 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:16:07 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id DF87E3BAC5E for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:19:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id cRe9gztWl2WEftAX for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 10:19:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:19:21 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] xfs: fix extent format buffer allocation size Message-ID: <20110407171921.GC6827@infradead.org> References: <1302070758-17312-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1302070758-17312-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20110406133816.GA16276@infradead.org> <20110407000505.GM31057@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110407000505.GM31057@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:05:05AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > The function is needed regardless of XFS_NATIVE_HOST due to the fact > it is needed to pick the real extents out of the n-core data fork > when delayed allocation extents are present. This is endian > independent. You're right. I was only looking at the attr fork side where we don't handle the delalloc extents. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs