From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bdi: mark the bdi flusher busy when being forked
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:34:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110411183412.GC32346@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302157196-1988-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 04:19:55PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Recetn attempts to use writeback_inode_sb_nr_if_idle() in XFs from
> memory reclaim context have caused deadlocks because memory reclaim
> call be called from a failed allocation during forking a flusher
> thread. The shrinker then attempts to trigger writeback and the bdi
> is considered idle because writeback is not in progress yet and then
> deadlocks because bdi_queue_work() blocks waiting for the
> BDI_Pending bit to clear which will never happen because it needs
> the fork to complete.
>
> To avoid this deadlock, consider writeback to be in progress if the
> flusher thread is being created. This prevents reclaim from blocking
> waiting for it be forked and hence avoids the deadlock.
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-11 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-07 6:19 [PATCH 0/2] xfs: write back inodes during reclaim Dave Chinner
2011-04-07 6:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] bdi: mark the bdi flusher busy when being forked Dave Chinner
2011-04-11 18:34 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-04-13 19:29 ` Alex Elder
2011-04-07 6:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: kick inode writeback when low on memory Dave Chinner
2011-04-11 18:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-11 21:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-13 20:33 ` Alex Elder
2011-04-14 5:08 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-15 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-15 7:23 ` [PATCH 0/2] xfs: write back inodes during reclaim Yann Dupont
2011-04-15 7:54 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-15 9:13 ` Yann Dupont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110411183412.GC32346@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox