From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p3FBaSI7064912 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:36:30 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A68D61640739 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 04:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Bpr7PqwLj2poUAis for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 04:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 07:39:50 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS status update for March 2011 Message-ID: <20110415113950.GA5045@infradead.org> References: <20110415103028.GA19528@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110415103028.GA19528@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:30:28AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > March saw the release of Linux 2.6.39, which included a sizable XFS update. As pointed out by multiple people this should read: March saw the release of Linux 2.6.38, .. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs