From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p3L4fSuU134551 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:41:29 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id B72193FD010 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:44:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id bpwAugSWWLEASMrv for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:44:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:44:56 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: obey minleft values during extent allocation correctly. Message-ID: <20110421044456.GA28859@infradead.org> References: <1303360144-10632-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1303360144-10632-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1303360144-10632-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 02:29:04PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > A further problem is that bmbt block allocation doesn't set the > total number of blocks correctly for the allocation, thereby > allowing it to allocate a block from the AGFL before failing on the > second block in xfs_alloc_fix_freelist(). The total needs to be set > so that it skips AGs that only have the minimum reserved > amount of AGFL blocks free in them. This patch doesn't contain the hunk to set "total". _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs