From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p3M4B2jA194236 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:11:02 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:14:30 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfs build warning Message-ID: <20110422041430.GA28590@infradead.org> References: <4DA876C2.8050606@oracle.com> <20110415173902.GA27378@infradead.org> <1303416490.2581.518.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1303416490.2581.518.camel@doink> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Randy Dunlap , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 03:08:10PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 13:39 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:48:02AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > on i386, when CONFIG_LBDAF is not enabled: > > > > > > fs/xfs/linux-2.6/./xfs_trace.h:1354: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 22 has type 'xfs_fsblock_t' > > > > This should fix it: > > Looks good. Christoph, can I assume your signoff? > > I wonder whether we'll ever need to cast the other > fields that are based on abstractions from __uint32_t > (like xfs_agblock_t, xfs_extlen_t, ...). I'll resend it with a proper changelog and signoff. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs