From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	p3M61Flp201170 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 01:01:17 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A52C41514BEA
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34])
	by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 1pC0YnqCGiCKQRXc for
	<xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 02:04:44 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39 delaylog default mount status
Message-ID: <20110422060444.GA10765@infradead.org>
References: <4DB117D7.4020307@hardwarefreak.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4DB117D7.4020307@hardwarefreak.com>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
Cc: "xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:53:27AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> If already asked and answered, my apologies.
> 
> Is delaylog still on track to be the default in 2.6.39?

Yes, it has been turned on by default since -rc1.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs