From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS/Linux Sanity check
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 10:58:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201105031058.23294@zmi.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110503031856.GA9114@dastard>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 873 bytes --]
On Dienstag, 3. Mai 2011 Dave Chinner wrote:
> > We're running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, and have tried either the stock
> > kernel (2.6.32-30) or 2.6.35 from linux.org.
>
> (OT: why do people install a desktop OS on their servers?)
I can only tell for us: We use openSUSE, and tried with SLES, but
support on openSUSE is better despite you pay for SLES, and openSUSE is
(by nature) newer in every package. And that gives you (nearly) actual
XFS improvements due to newer kernels and therefore more performance
(e.g. delaylog).
--
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc
it-management Internet Services: Protéger
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531
// ****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ******
// http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716
//
// Haus zu verkaufen: http://zmi.at/langegg/
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-03 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-02 15:47 XFS/Linux Sanity check Paul Anderson
2011-05-02 17:09 ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-02 17:13 ` Emmanuel Florac
2011-06-11 1:33 ` FYI: LSI rebuilding; and XFS speed V. raw - hints on maxing out 'dd'....(if not already obvious) Linda Walsh
2011-06-11 9:30 ` Emmanuel Florac
2011-06-11 16:48 ` Linda Walsh
2011-05-03 3:18 ` XFS/Linux Sanity check Dave Chinner
2011-05-03 8:58 ` Michael Monnerie [this message]
2011-05-03 16:05 ` Paul Anderson
2011-05-04 10:36 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-05-04 6:18 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-05-04 1:10 ` Stan Hoeppner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201105031058.23294@zmi.at \
--to=michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox