From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p4K2wiMc067612 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:58:44 -0500 Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 176B6CEBF20 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:58:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id JMV8KFUJilwV5T3c for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:58:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 12:58:40 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: Failure of xfstest 229 Message-ID: <20110520025840.GP32466@dastard> References: <1305852937.7661.369.camel@chandra-lucid.beaverton.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1305852937.7661.369.camel@chandra-lucid.beaverton.ibm.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Chandra Seetharaman Cc: XFS Mailing List On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 05:55:37PM -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > Hi all, > > I remember running this test successfully sometime back. No. it's never passed. It's a placeholder to remind us how to reproduce a known problem that is difficult to fix. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs