From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p4P0Tq7c105885 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:29:52 -0500 Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 41D9447CBAF for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id V1C5cVXEqQOfmXOh for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 10:29:47 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: XFS umount issue Message-ID: <20110525002947.GK32466@dastard> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Nuno Subtil Cc: Paul Anderson , xfs-oss On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:10:44PM -0700, Nuno Subtil wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:33, Paul Anderson wrote: > > Hi Nuno - can you elaborate on the ARM hardware? =A0I noticed that my > > XFS on ARM was mildly unstable, but felt it wasn't XFS code, but > > rather the ARM port of Linux. =A0My test case is a Seagate Dockstar > > hacked to run Linux. > = > Mine is a Netgear Stora. The interesting bit is that the stock > firmware runs kernel 2.6.22.18 and uses XFS as well, but I don't know > how stable it was to begin with. Have you checked to see whether there are extra patches added to that kernel by Netgear? It's not uncommon for these embedded systems to run a kernel that has been patched to fix problems that you are seeing. Cheers, Dave. -- = Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs