From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p57Bsiac023393 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 06:54:45 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0C93615DF3F1 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 04:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id shxGZTmTHKusOXyE for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 04:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 07:54:42 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect Message-ID: <20110607115441.GA4653@infradead.org> References: <4DEE0EA4.9090002@profihost.ag> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DEE0EA4.9090002@profihost.ag> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:42:28PM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > Hi, > > it seems that a bug was backported into the latest 2.6.32 longterm > stable kernel. Now the patch "XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes > is incorrect" needs to get backported to 2.6.32. > > Who can help? Who is responsible? For -stable releases no one really is. If you want to help you can backport it and send it to the stable mailinglist. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs