From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	p57DYUTx026024 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:34:31 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 411184A5B99
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue,  7 Jun 2011 06:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org
	(173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net
	[173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id
	NbueBSv4btKZy0Ns for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>;
	Tue, 07 Jun 2011 06:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:34:29 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect
Message-ID: <20110607133429.GA9049@infradead.org>
References: <4DEE0EA4.9090002@profihost.ag>
	<20110607115441.GA4653@infradead.org>
	<4DEE2078.3010102@profihost.ag>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4DEE2078.3010102@profihost.ag>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com

On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:58:32PM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> Sorry i can't. I'm not a kernel hacker. But i think a real bug /
> showstopper should be fixed in a longterm stable kernel.

Linux 2.6.32 isn't really something supported by us.  It's not just a
very old codebase, but also one where a lot of the XFS code was pretty
much in flux.  If you want supported old releases work use one of
the commercially supported one like RedHat or SuSE.

> Redhat seems to have fixed it on it's own:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642680

I suspect the upstream commit you want is
081003fff467ea0e727f66d5d435b4f473a789b3, but I can't gurantee this
actually applies to the 2.6.32 codebase.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs