From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p58FlNJ6103077 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:47:23 -0500 Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 57B2A16B127C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (smtp4-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.4]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id UNHjPTHp6odPFEoE for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harpe.intellique.com (unknown [82.225.196.72]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F18F4C8188 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:47:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:47:24 +0200 From: Emmanuel Florac Subject: Status of XFS ACL limitations Message-ID: <20110608174724.23ea57f7@harpe.intellique.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hello everyone, I was looking through list archive and found that: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-03/msg00329.html 2 years later is there any progress? 25 ACLs entries still are not enough for many uses :) regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique | | +33 1 78 94 84 02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs