From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
To: Linda Walsh <xfs@tlinx.org>
Cc: Paul Anderson <pha@umich.edu>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: FYI: LSI rebuilding; and XFS speed V. raw - hints on maxing out 'dd'....(if not already obvious)...
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:30:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110611113049.2868f9c7@galadriel2.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DF2C5D4.6030507@tlinx.org>
Le Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:33:08 -0700 vous écriviez:
> I have a 9285-8E and have been pretty happy with it's performance,
> but I only have 10 data disks (2x6-disk RAID5 =>RAID50) with 2TB
> SATA's and get 1GB perf... about what I'd expect from disks that get
> around 120MB each and doing 2 RAID5 calcs...)...
I've made some more tests since then, and I was using cheapo drives for
testing that for some reason, behave extraordinarily poorly in
combination with the LSI card. I've retested the card with hitachi
Ultrastars and it worked just fine (though a bit slower than Adaptec
6xx5). OTOH, the Adaptec works fine with the "bad" drives too, go
figure.
I didn't yet explored the advanced capabilities of the card (apparently
it may have some snapshot mechanism) because MegaCli is such a PITA :)
regards,
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@intellique.com>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-11 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-02 15:47 XFS/Linux Sanity check Paul Anderson
2011-05-02 17:09 ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-02 17:13 ` Emmanuel Florac
2011-06-11 1:33 ` FYI: LSI rebuilding; and XFS speed V. raw - hints on maxing out 'dd'....(if not already obvious) Linda Walsh
2011-06-11 9:30 ` Emmanuel Florac [this message]
2011-06-11 16:48 ` Linda Walsh
2011-05-03 3:18 ` XFS/Linux Sanity check Dave Chinner
2011-05-03 8:58 ` Michael Monnerie
2011-05-03 16:05 ` Paul Anderson
2011-05-04 10:36 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-05-04 6:18 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-05-04 1:10 ` Stan Hoeppner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110611113049.2868f9c7@galadriel2.home \
--to=eflorac@intellique.com \
--cc=pha@umich.edu \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@tlinx.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox