From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p5EE3skB085528 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:03:55 -0500 Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id D47C94DFD7F for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id gZNXEgBhOZF9iyrM for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:03:48 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: xfstest run result on 2.6.35.13 X86, 51 test cases failed Message-ID: <20110614140348.GD32466@dastard> References: <20110613141324.GC32466@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ajeet Yadav Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 02:08:59PM +0530, Ajeet Yadav wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 02:16:02PM +0530, Ajeet Yadav wrote: > >> Dear All. > >> I have installed the 2.6.35.13 long term valilla kernel release > >> (www.kenrel.org) on my Intel core 2 duo PC, and run 11-05-2011 xfstest > >> version, and run on it, below is the list of fails test cases. > >> As far as I know community uses xfstest for QA, seeing so many fails, > >> I am bit worried. > > > > It shouldn't fail very many tests at all... > > > >> Can anyone hepl me know that why so many fails, is I missed some > >> config option ? or these test cases are not applicable ? or there is > >> someting else > > > > Well, without telling us why the tests are failing (i.e. copy all > > the output rather than just telling us some tests failed) we have no > > idea what the failures you are seeing are. Without some indication > > of what they failures are nobody can really comment on your > > situation.... > > I better to send the xfstest log as attachment becuase of it large size Which means I can't easily quote sections of it. It looks like you are running "check" without a group specification, so it's just running all the tests, including known broken tests (e.g. test 018). It looks like there are problems unmounting the scratch device as a result, so lots of tests are subsequently failing due to that. You should be running either the "auto" or "quick" group tests. Aslo, seeing failures like this: 180 [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see 180.out.bad) --- 180.out 2011-05-11 22:32:24.000000000 +0530 +++ 180.out.bad 2011-06-09 18:18:39.666610999 +0530 @@ -1 +1,3 @@ QA output created by 180 +common.config: Error: $SCRATCH_MNT (/home/manish/Projects/xfstests/sdb4) is not a directory +./180: line 38: _cleanup_testdir: command not found Makes me think you've got problems with your test setup that need to be fixed before you go any further. FWIW, your tests are running terribly slowly - e.g. it's taking 2795 seconds to run test 013 on a non-debug kernel. It takes 20s to run in a VM on my laptop (and it's quite a slow laptop) so I really suspect you may have some deeper problem of which the xfstests failures are just a symptom of.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs