From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/27] xfs: split xfs_itruncate_finish
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:44:28 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110630024428.GB561@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110629140338.286808024@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:01:18AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Split the guts of xfs_itruncate_finish that loop over the existing extents
> and calls xfs_bunmapi on them into a new helper, xfs_itruncate_externs.
> Make xfs_attr_inactive call it directly instead of xfs_itruncate_finish,
> which allows to simplify the latter a lot, by only letting it deal with
> the data fork. As a result xfs_itruncate_finish is renamed to
> xfs_itruncate_data to make its use case more obvious.
>
> Also remove the sync parameter from xfs_itruncate_data, which has been
> unessecary since the introduction of the busy extent list in 2002, and
> completely dead code since 2003 when the XFS_BMAPI_ASYNC parameter was
> made a no-op.
>
> I can't actually see why the xfs_attr_inactive needs to set the transaction
> sync, but let's keep this patch simple and without changes in behaviour.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Overall, looks good. A few minor comments in line, but consider it
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> + struct xfs_trans *ntp = *tpp;
> + xfs_bmap_free_t free_list;
> + xfs_fsblock_t first_block;
> + xfs_fileoff_t first_unmap_block;
> + xfs_fileoff_t last_block;
> + xfs_filblks_t unmap_len;
> + int committed;
> + int error = 0;
> + int done = 0;
>
> ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
> - ASSERT((new_size == 0) || (new_size <= ip->i_size));
> - ASSERT(*tp != NULL);
> - ASSERT((*tp)->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES);
> - ASSERT(ip->i_transp == *tp);
> + ASSERT(new_size == 0 || new_size <= ip->i_size);
If new_size == 0, then it will always be <= ip->i_size, so that's
kind of a redundant check. I think this really should be two
different asserts, one that validates the data fork new_size range,
and one that validates the attr fork truncate to zero length only
condition:
ASSERT(new_size <= ip->i_size);
ASSERT(whichfork != XFS_ATTR_FORK || new_size == 0);
> @@ -1464,15 +1311,16 @@ xfs_itruncate_finish(
> }
>
> ntp = xfs_trans_dup(ntp);
> - error = xfs_trans_commit(*tp, 0);
> - *tp = ntp;
> + error = xfs_trans_commit(*tpp, 0);
> + *tpp = ntp;
I've always found this a mess to follow which transaction is which
because of the rewriting of ntp. This is easier to follow:
ntp = xfs_trans_dup(*tpp);
error = xfs_trans_commit(*tpp, 0);
*tpp = ntp;
Now it's clear that we are duplicating *tpp, then committing it, and
then setting it to the duplicated transaction. Now I don't have to
go look at all the surrounding code to remind myself what ntp
contains to validate that the fragment of code is doing the right
thing.....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-30 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-29 14:01 [PATCH 00/27] patch queue for Linux 3.1 Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 01/27] xfs: PF_FSTRANS should never be set in ->writepage Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-30 1:34 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 02/27] xfs: remove the unused ilock_nowait codepath in writepage Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-30 0:15 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-30 1:26 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-30 6:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 03/27] xfs: use write_cache_pages for writeback clustering Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-30 2:00 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-30 2:48 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-30 6:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-01 2:22 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-01 4:18 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-01 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-01 9:20 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-01 9:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-01 14:59 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-01 15:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-02 2:42 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-05 14:10 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-05 15:55 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-11 10:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-01 15:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-04 3:25 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-05 14:34 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-06 1:23 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-11 11:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-06 4:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-06 6:47 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-06 7:17 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-06 15:12 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-07-08 9:54 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-11 17:20 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-07-11 17:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 19:09 ` Rik van Riel
2011-07-01 8:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 04/27] xfs: cleanup xfs_add_to_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 22:13 ` Alex Elder
2011-06-30 2:00 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 05/27] xfs: work around bogus gcc warning in xfs_allocbt_init_cursor Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 22:13 ` Alex Elder
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 06/27] xfs: split xfs_setattr Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 22:13 ` Alex Elder
2011-06-30 7:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-30 12:28 ` Alex Elder
2011-06-30 2:11 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 08/27] xfs: kill xfs_itruncate_start Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 22:13 ` Alex Elder
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 09/27] xfs: split xfs_itruncate_finish Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-30 2:44 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-06-30 7:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 10/27] xfs: improve sync behaviour in the fact of aggressive dirtying Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-30 2:52 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 11/27] xfs: fix filesystsem freeze race in xfs_trans_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-30 2:59 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 12/27] xfs: remove i_transp Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-30 3:00 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 13/27] xfs: factor out xfs_dir2_leaf_find_entry Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-30 6:11 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-30 7:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 14/27] xfs: cleanup shortform directory inode number handling Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-30 6:35 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-30 7:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 15/27] xfs: kill struct xfs_dir2_sf Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-30 7:04 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-30 7:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 16/27] xfs: cleanup the defintion of struct xfs_dir2_sf_entry Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 17/27] xfs: avoid usage of struct xfs_dir2_block Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 18/27] xfs: kill " Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 19/27] xfs: avoid usage of struct xfs_dir2_data Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 20/27] xfs: kill " Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 21/27] xfs: cleanup the defintion of struct xfs_dir2_data_entry Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 22/27] xfs: cleanup struct xfs_dir2_leaf Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 23/27] xfs: remove the unused xfs_bufhash structure Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 24/27] xfs: clean up buffer locking helpers Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 25/27] xfs: return the buffer locked from xfs_buf_get_uncached Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 26/27] xfs: cleanup I/O-related buffer flags Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:01 ` [PATCH 27/27] xfs: avoid a few disk cache flushes Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-30 6:36 ` [PATCH 00/27] patch queue for Linux 3.1 Dave Chinner
2011-06-30 6:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110630024428.GB561@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox