From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p648E5J6124659 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 03:14:05 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0E2F95245BC for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 01:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id snlmvM27PokKNTbW for ; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 01:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 04:13:12 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] xfs: fix AIL bulk insert issues and cleanups Message-ID: <20110704081312.GA22496@infradead.org> References: <1309757260-5484-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1309757260-5484-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 03:27:35PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > The first two patches fix the recently reported rm -rf performance > and interactivity problems when using delay??d logging. These should > probably be considered for 3.0-rc5. I think it's a bit late for patch 2. Patch 1 is triviall, and helps with a regression introduced in 2.6.39 by switching to the delaylog mode, but patch 2 is a bit too large for this in the merge window unless absolutely nessecary. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs