From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p668YTjB093796 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 03:34:29 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 04:34:27 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/27] xfs: cleanup the defintion of struct xfs_dir2_sf_entry Message-ID: <20110706083427.GC19861@infradead.org> References: <20110701094321.936534538@bombadil.infradead.org> <20110701094605.415405585@bombadil.infradead.org> <1309923211.3381.27.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1309923211.3381.27.camel@doink> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:33:31PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 05:43 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Remove the inumber member which is at a variable offset after the actual > > name, and make name a real variable sized C99 array instead of the incorrect > > one-sized array which confuses (not only) gcc. Based on this clean up > > the helpers to calculate the entry size. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > Why was the inode put after then name in the > first place? I've wondered that, too. But it's been long before my time. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs