public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] xfs: factor out xfs_dir2_leaf_find_stale
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 05:09:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110712090954.GB8364@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310423573.7019.55.camel@doink>

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 05:32:53PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> > +		continue;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Find the first stale entry at or after our index, if any.
> > +	 * Stop if the answer would be worse than lowstale.
> 
>               Stop if the result would require moving more
>               entries than using lowstale.
> 
> (I realize you didn't change this comment, you just moved
> it into this helper function.)

I'll change it.

> Actually it seems like this searching of the stale
> entries and moving things around among them could
> be broken into a few even finer-grained utility
> routines.  It just seems like what this code is
> doing is simpler than what the code complexity
> suggests (though I haven't really looked at this
> stuff much before).

Some of this code could use some refactoring, but it's going to be
more complex than this patch.  Additionally a lot of the logic is
duplicate in the block format code, but that format has the freespace
"header" at the end in struct xfs_dir2_block_tail, which for the fun
of it uses 32-bit count and stale fields instead of the 16-bit values
in struct xfs_dir2_leaf_hdr.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-12  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-10 20:49 [PATCH 00/11] a few more cleanups for Linux 3.1 Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: reshuffle dir2 headers Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:32   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-12  9:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: cleanup struct xfs_dir2_free Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:32   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: factor out xfs_dir2_leaf_find_stale Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:32   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-12  9:09     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-07-13  6:49     ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-13  7:16       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-13 10:28         ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: factor out xfs_da_grow_inode_int Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11  0:37   ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-11  5:24     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-12  0:55       ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-11 22:32   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: add a proper transaction pointer to struct xfs_buf Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:33   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-12  9:12     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: remove wrappers around b_fspriv Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:33   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-12  1:02     ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-12  9:15       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: remove wrappers around b_iodone Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:33   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: remove the unused xfs_buf_delwri_sort function Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:33   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: remove the dead QUOTADEBUG debug Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:33   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-12  0:59     ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: remove leftovers of the old btree tracing code Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-12  2:52   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: kill the dead XFS_DABUF debug code Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:33   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-13  6:51 ` [PATCH 00/11] a few more cleanups for Linux 3.1 Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110712090954.GB8364@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=aelder@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox