From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] xfs: factor out xfs_dir2_leaf_find_stale
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 03:16:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110713071654.GA21252@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110713064936.GP23038@dastard>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 04:49:36PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > + --*lowstale)
> > > + continue;
>
> Only thing I was conerned about was the indenting on these loops.
> Something like this:
>
> for (*lowstale = index - 1;
> *lowstale >= 0 &&
> leaf->ents[*lowstale].address !=
> cpu_to_be32(XFS_DIR2_NULL_DATAPTR);
> --*lowstale)
> continue;
>
> means that at a glance it is easy to separate the loop control
> statements from the body of the loop just by indentation.
I tried to avoid changing anything here, but now that other people
like me hate these uglies I think I have to ite the bullet and
actually untangle those loops. The version below is what I'm submitting
to testing now:
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: xfs: factor out xfs_dir2_leaf_find_stale
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c
===================================================================
--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c 2011-07-13 09:00:10.333246566 +0200
+++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c 2011-07-13 09:08:52.217085945 +0200
@@ -148,6 +148,38 @@ xfs_dir2_block_to_leaf(
return 0;
}
+STATIC void
+xfs_dir2_leaf_find_stale(
+ struct xfs_dir2_leaf *leaf,
+ int index,
+ int *lowstale,
+ int *highstale)
+{
+ /*
+ * Find the first stale entry before our index, if any.
+ */
+ for (*lowstale = index - 1; *lowstale >= 0; --*lowstale) {
+ if (leaf->ents[*lowstale].address ==
+ cpu_to_be32(XFS_DIR2_NULL_DATAPTR))
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Find the first stale entry at or after our index, if any.
+ * Stop if the result would require moving more entries than using
+ * lowstale.
+ */
+ for (*highstale = index;
+ *highstale < be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.count);
+ ++*highstale) {
+ if (leaf->ents[*highstale].address ==
+ cpu_to_be32(XFS_DIR2_NULL_DATAPTR))
+ break;
+ if (*lowstale >= 0 && index - *lowstale <= *highstale - index)
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
struct xfs_dir2_leaf_entry *
xfs_dir2_leaf_find_entry(
xfs_dir2_leaf_t *leaf, /* leaf structure */
@@ -190,32 +222,8 @@ xfs_dir2_leaf_find_entry(
* If we didn't compact before, we need to find the nearest stale
* entries before and after our insertion point.
*/
- if (compact == 0) {
- /*
- * Find the first stale entry before the insertion point,
- * if any.
- */
- for (lowstale = index - 1;
- lowstale >= 0 &&
- leaf->ents[lowstale].address !=
- cpu_to_be32(XFS_DIR2_NULL_DATAPTR);
- lowstale--)
- continue;
-
- /*
- * Find the next stale entry at or after the insertion point,
- * if any. Stop if we go so far that the lowstale entry
- * would be better.
- */
- for (highstale = index;
- highstale < be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.count) &&
- leaf->ents[highstale].address !=
- cpu_to_be32(XFS_DIR2_NULL_DATAPTR) &&
- (lowstale < 0 ||
- index - lowstale - 1 >= highstale - index);
- highstale++)
- continue;
- }
+ if (compact == 0)
+ xfs_dir2_leaf_find_stale(leaf, index, &lowstale, &highstale);
/*
* If the low one is better, use it.
@@ -689,26 +697,9 @@ xfs_dir2_leaf_compact_x1(
leaf = bp->data;
ASSERT(be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.stale) > 1);
index = *indexp;
- /*
- * Find the first stale entry before our index, if any.
- */
- for (lowstale = index - 1;
- lowstale >= 0 &&
- leaf->ents[lowstale].address !=
- cpu_to_be32(XFS_DIR2_NULL_DATAPTR);
- lowstale--)
- continue;
- /*
- * Find the first stale entry at or after our index, if any.
- * Stop if the answer would be worse than lowstale.
- */
- for (highstale = index;
- highstale < be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.count) &&
- leaf->ents[highstale].address !=
- cpu_to_be32(XFS_DIR2_NULL_DATAPTR) &&
- (lowstale < 0 || index - lowstale > highstale - index);
- highstale++)
- continue;
+
+ xfs_dir2_leaf_find_stale(leaf, index, &lowstale, &highstale);
+
/*
* Pick the better of lowstale and highstale.
*/
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-13 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-10 20:49 [PATCH 00/11] a few more cleanups for Linux 3.1 Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: reshuffle dir2 headers Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:32 ` Alex Elder
2011-07-12 9:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: cleanup struct xfs_dir2_free Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:32 ` Alex Elder
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: factor out xfs_dir2_leaf_find_stale Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:32 ` Alex Elder
2011-07-12 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-13 6:49 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-13 7:16 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-07-13 10:28 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: factor out xfs_da_grow_inode_int Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 0:37 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-11 5:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-12 0:55 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-11 22:32 ` Alex Elder
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: add a proper transaction pointer to struct xfs_buf Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:33 ` Alex Elder
2011-07-12 9:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: remove wrappers around b_fspriv Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:33 ` Alex Elder
2011-07-12 1:02 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-12 9:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: remove wrappers around b_iodone Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:33 ` Alex Elder
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: remove the unused xfs_buf_delwri_sort function Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:33 ` Alex Elder
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: remove the dead QUOTADEBUG debug Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:33 ` Alex Elder
2011-07-12 0:59 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: remove leftovers of the old btree tracing code Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-12 2:52 ` Alex Elder
2011-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: kill the dead XFS_DABUF debug code Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 22:33 ` Alex Elder
2011-07-13 6:51 ` [PATCH 00/11] a few more cleanups for Linux 3.1 Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110713071654.GA21252@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox