From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p6DCqn4U084033 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:52:49 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 786611E605DA for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 05:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id NkMdnlCRbOuR6FrB for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 05:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:52:47 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: XFS status update for June 2011 Message-ID: <20110713125247.GA27049@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In June we saw more release candidates for Linux 3.0, which contain a few XFS fixes but no major updates. No updates were committed to the XFS development tree for Linux 3.1 either, although the mailing list has been rather busy with updates for that merge window. On the user space side the xfsprogs and xfsdump repositories didn't see any updates, while xfstests has been rather busy with a lot of fixes to various test cases. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs