public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guus Sliepen <Guus.Sliepen@astro.su.se>
To: Peter Klotz <peter.klotz99@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	Roman Kononov <kernel@kononov.ftml.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem?
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:29:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110714192945.GX18364@sliepen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E1F2F5D.8060505@gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1444 bytes --]

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 08:03:09PM +0200, Peter Klotz wrote:

> On 07/14/2011 01:23 PM, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> 
> >I'm having a problem with a system having an XFS filesystem on RAID locking up
> >fairly consistently when writing large amounts of data to it, with several
> >kernels, including 2.6.38.2 and 2.6.39.3, on both AMD and Intel multi-core
> >processors. The kernel always logs this several times:
> >
> >BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 67s! [kswapd0:33]
[...]
> This Bugzilla entry documents the XFS bug from 2009 in detail
> including links:
> 
> http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=805

Aha, I did not look at that before.

> The problem was finally solved by a patch proposed by Linus. This is
> the reason the original patch developed by Nick never made it into
> the kernel.
> 
> My tests back then showed that both patches fixed the problem.
> 
> It seems you have found a test case where just Nick's patch helps.

Yes. I agree with Linus that the root cause should be fixed, not the symptoms.
I don't have time to dive in the kernel code myself, but I do have several
nearly identical machines where I can test things on. I will be happy to test
out patches and/or different kernel versions or kernel configurations, and I
can provide dmesg output and perhaps other information if necessary.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <Guus.Sliepen@astro.su.se>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2011-07-14 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <gifgp1$8ic$1@ger.gmane.org>
2008-12-23 17:12 ` BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem? Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-30  4:23   ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-03 21:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-05  1:48       ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05  4:19         ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05  6:48           ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 14:25             ` Roman Kononov
2009-01-05 16:21             ` Peter Klotz
2009-01-05 16:41               ` [patch] mm: fix lockless pagecache reordering bug (was Re: BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem?) Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 17:30                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 18:00                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 18:44                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 19:39                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-06 17:17                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 20:12                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 20:39                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 21:57                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-06  2:05                             ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-06  2:23                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-06  2:29                               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-06  8:38                               ` Peter Klotz
2009-01-06  8:43                                 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-06 16:16                               ` Roman Kononov
2009-01-05 21:04                         ` [patch] mm: fix lockless pagecache reordering bug (was Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-05 21:58                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-14 11:23             ` BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem? Guus Sliepen
2011-07-14 18:03               ` Peter Klotz
2011-07-14 19:29                 ` Guus Sliepen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110714192945.GX18364@sliepen.org \
    --to=guus.sliepen@astro.su.se \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kernel@kononov.ftml.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=peter.klotz99@gmail.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox