From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p6MFverA092705 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:57:40 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4E557EF50F2 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id y5V6l1C8DUnnWEAY for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:57:37 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Updated xfsprogs 2.6.38 merge Message-ID: <20110722155737.GA7261@infradead.org> References: <20110705024855.GA561@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110705024855.GA561@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 12:48:55PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Folks, > > I pushed out an updated 2.6.38 kernel merge to xfsprogs patchset a > couple of days ago. I've been doing quite a bit of testing on it, > both 32 bit and 64 bit, with 512 byte, 1k and 4k block size > filesystems and I haven't come across any regressions. The patchset > can be found here: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfsprogs-dev kernel-2.6.38-sync > > It's pretty much unchanged from the last set of patches I sent, > except for one minor fix to the radix tree code for an off by one in > the path array size for item and tag deletes. > > I'm pretty much ready to commit this update so I can then move > forward with updating it to the 3.0 kernel code base as a smaller > incremental series. With the xfs_imap.h changes in, and the radix-tree bits fixed up I'm fine with this merge and you can add my reviewed-by tags to all commits. I'd also suggest removing the testing details in the main patch commit log, as it seems a bit misplaced in there. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs