From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p6OBUUwY205759 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 06:30:30 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:30:28 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfs: encapsulate a block of debug code Message-ID: <20110724113028.GA23267@infradead.org> References: <201107181814.p6IIEAZm028909@stout.americas.sgi.com> <20110719171028.GA31088@infradead.org> <1311104952.1964.24.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1311104952.1964.24.camel@doink> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 02:49:12PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > What about xfs_da_blkinfo_onlychild_validate()? Sounds a bit clumsy, but given that I can't suggest a better one I'm fine with it. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs