public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12 v3] xfs: Remove the macro XFS_BUF_ZEROFLAGS
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:39:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110724113959.GD26332@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110722233945.14612.1955.sendpatchset@chandra-lucid.beaverton.ibm.com>

> @@ -1247,6 +1247,7 @@ xlog_bdstrat(
>  {
>  	struct xlog_in_core	*iclog = bp->b_fspriv;
>  
> +	bp->b_flags &= ~(XBF_FUA|XBF_FLUSH);

I don't think this is correct, we set these before calling into
xlog_bdstrat, so this means we'll always stip it off after that.

Given that this area is more complicated than the pure macro removal
how about letting it as-is for now?  I have some bigger refactoring
in this area in my queue, and I'll just incorporate the
XFS_BUF_ZEROFLAGS into it.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-24 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-22 23:39 [PATCH 00/12 v3] Remove number of macros from xfs_buf.h Chandra Seetharaman
2011-07-22 23:39 ` [PATCH 01/12 v3] xfs: Remove the macro XFS_BUF_BFLAGS Chandra Seetharaman
2011-07-22 23:39 ` [PATCH 02/12 v3] xfs: Remove the macro XFS_BUF_ZEROFLAGS Chandra Seetharaman
2011-07-24 11:39   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-07-25 15:57     ` Alex Elder
2011-07-25 16:27       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-25 17:07         ` Alex Elder
2011-07-25 17:09           ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-25 22:21           ` Chandra Seetharaman
2011-07-25 14:51   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-22 23:39 ` [PATCH 03/12 v3] xfs: Remove the macro XFS_BUF_ERROR and family Chandra Seetharaman
2011-07-24 11:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-22 23:39 ` [PATCH 04/12 v3] xfs: Remove macro XFS_BUF_BUSY " Chandra Seetharaman
2011-07-22 23:40 ` [PATCH 05/12 v3] xfs: Remove macro XFS_BUF_HOLD Chandra Seetharaman
2011-07-22 23:40 ` [PATCH 06/12 v3] xfs: Remove macro XFS_BUF_SET_START Chandra Seetharaman
2011-07-22 23:40 ` [PATCH 07/12 v3] xfs: Remove the macro XFS_BUF_PTR Chandra Seetharaman
2011-07-22 23:40 ` [PATCH 08/12 v3] xfs: Remove the macro XFS_BUF_SET_PTR Chandra Seetharaman
2011-07-22 23:40 ` [PATCH 09/12 v3] Replace the macro XFS_BUF_ISPINNED with helper xfs_buf_ispinned Chandra Seetharaman
2011-07-22 23:40 ` [PATCH 10/12 v3] xfs: Remove the macro XFS_BUF_SET_TARGET Chandra Seetharaman
2011-07-24 11:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-22 23:40 ` [PATCH 11/12 v3] xfs: Remove the macro XFS_BUF_TARGET Chandra Seetharaman
2011-07-22 23:40 ` [PATCH 12/12 v3] xfs: Remove the macro XFS_BUFTARG_NAME Chandra Seetharaman
2011-07-25 17:36 ` [PATCH 00/12 v3] Remove number of macros from xfs_buf.h Alex Elder
2011-07-25 20:26   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110724113959.GD26332@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox