From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p6OCfvwR208560 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:41:57 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E06211E6A6DB for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 05:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 8wmytvYacXjLdHMc for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 05:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 08:41:53 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix modulo-by-zero error in fsx Message-ID: <20110724124153.GA5735@infradead.org> References: <1311047353-23925-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1311047353-23925-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com I still get fairly regular 091 failures on my 32-bit userspace VM after this. The interesting thing is that fsx tells we have a mismatch of the junk vs junk.fsxgood files, but when looking at them using diff or cmp they actually are identical. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs