From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p6TFofo5052842 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:50:42 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 976C09E2B0 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:50:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Etd928WZxnezh22r for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:50:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:50:39 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: [PATCH, RFC] jfs support for xfstests Message-ID: <20110729155039.GA28306@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, xfs@oss.sgi.com The patch below adds basic jfs support to xfstests. Unfortunately it doesn't get very far, as test 001 already blows up with a kernel crash, as do 011 and 013 as other random picks. Index: xfstests-dev/common.rc =================================================================== --- xfstests-dev.orig/common.rc 2011-07-29 15:36:52.000000000 +0000 +++ xfstests-dev/common.rc 2011-07-29 15:39:41.000000000 +0000 @@ -102,6 +102,9 @@ _mkfs_opts() gfs2) export MKFS_OPTIONS="$GFS2_MKFS_OPTIONS -O -p lock_nolock" ;; + jfs) + export MKFS_OPTIONS="$JFS_MKFS_OPTIONS -q" + ;; *) ;; esac _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs