From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	p6UGtK8d148399 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:55:20 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id C9B1A1EF1191
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org
	(173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net
	[173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id
	Ai0oYCAMIk25q1jI for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>;
	Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:55:17 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH XFSPROGS 2/3] Build without enabling DEBUG by default
Message-ID: <20110730165517.GA13918@infradead.org>
References: <1311292237-4155-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
	<1311292237-4155-2-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
	<20110722141753.GA19681@infradead.org>
	<20110722183048.GC25092@thunk.org>
	<20110722183830.GA21744@infradead.org>
	<20110722223458.GD25092@thunk.org>
	<20110723013214.GA22837@infradead.org>
	<20110726151033.GA18311@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110726151033.GA18311@infradead.org>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:10:33AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This looks much better, and is indeed similar to some other fixes we
> > recently had to put in, probably due to changing make behaviour.
> > 
> > If you add a signoff and a proper description I'll put it into all the
> > repositories.
> 
> Can you at least provide the signoff?  I can take care of the rest if
> this means I can get it in ASAP.

Ted,

can you please give me a signoff for this patch?  I could probably just
put it in anyway given how trivial it is.  But let's just stick to the
proper protocol if we can.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs