From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p71B3GH3001524 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 06:03:16 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 86BF84C4BF4 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 04:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id x2tRJE23p5a7Hfgx for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 04:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 07:03:12 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] xfstests: Changed a couple of tests to be generic Message-ID: <20110801110312.GA9446@infradead.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Stefan Behrens Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com These look good to me. Unless anyone has objections I'll pull them in tomorrow. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs