From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p7MET4Vl071578 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:29:04 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 87707FDD0A for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 07:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id K4IFkXjn19P0C34e for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 07:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:29:02 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] xfs: reduce ioend latency Message-ID: <20110822142902.GC24433@infradead.org> References: <20110814222412.359079843@bombadil.infradead.org> <20110814222518.001177781@bombadil.infradead.org> <20110822064345.GM3162@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110822064345.GM3162@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 04:43:45PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > That's similar to a check I added in a previous patch series to > avoid taking the ILOCK in IO completion if it wasn't necessary. THis > just checks earlier to avoid the workqueue switch, so it definitely > better than what I did. Yes, that's where it came from. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs