From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p7P5IEft163594 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:18:14 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0A1481C02C72 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 22:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Z6su2eGD8UUOvlTH for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 22:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:18:12 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: 3.0.1: xfs hang Message-ID: <20110825051812.GC1869@infradead.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Justin Piszcz Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 03:38:21PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: > Hi, > > Forgot to remove 'delaylog' from my fstab on one of my machines, > while rm -rf a large directory with many files: Does it actually hand the machine, or do you get the warning and then work continues? Unfortunately your backtrace doesn't seem overly reliable, so it's kinda hard to figure out what is going on. There is nothing delaylog related in the provided one though. If it halfway matches what is going on it seems to be block I/O related. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs