From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p7P66ban165799 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:06:38 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id DF4541924296 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id oE8ARB8qnY4tB15P for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:06:32 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests 255: add a seek_data/seek_hole tester Message-ID: <20110825060632.GA9933@infradead.org> References: <1309275199-10801-1-git-send-email-josef@redhat.com> <1309275199-10801-5-git-send-email-josef@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1309275199-10801-5-git-send-email-josef@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Josef Bacik Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, dchinner@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:33:19AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > This is a test to make sure seek_data/seek_hole is acting like it does on > Solaris. It will check to see if the fs supports finding a hole or not and will > adjust as necessary. Can you resend this with any updates that happened in the meantime? Dave also still had some comments about semantics, so it might be worth to incorporate that as well. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs