From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p7UCBGFi135158 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:11:18 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id DD932125BD3 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 05:11:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ueYbhJn8VJQ7VAPe for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 05:11:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QyN9s-00068Q-86 for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:11:12 +0000 Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:11:12 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: RFC: merging the quota source files Message-ID: <20110830121112.GA19509@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi, I've started a bit work on the quota code, and the split between the implementation files is rather annoying. I'd suggest we merge at least xfs_dquot.c and xfs_qm.c into a single file, as there is no visible split. Given how small and useless xfs_qm_bhv.c is I'd throw it in. As a second pass I'd also like to kill xfs_qm_syscalls.c and merge it into the new xfs_qm.c/xfs_dquot.c for the low-level helpers, and xfs_quotaops.c for high-level code that deals directly with the Linux interface. Does this a) sound good to others, and b) does anyone have a preference for the name of the new quota implementation file? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs