From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p8AIvKPn123516 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:57:20 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:57:18 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/25] xfs: move allocation ranges inode bmalloca structure Message-ID: <20110910185718.GC4750@infradead.org> References: <20110824060428.789245205@bombadil.infradead.org> <20110824060644.392598929@bombadil.infradead.org> <1315612576.1999.134.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1315612576.1999.134.camel@doink> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 06:56:16PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > Lots of this patch is simply renaming xfs_bmalloca fields > "off" -> "offset", "rval" -> "blkno", and "alen" -> "length". > Those are very much appreciated changes. I know there are > already a lot of patches in this series but it would have > been easier to see the "real" change had that part been > pulled out as a trivial extra one. I'll look into it. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs