From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p8CK5k37015657 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:05:47 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:05:43 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfs deadlock in stable kernel 3.0.4 Message-ID: <20110912200543.GA22409@infradead.org> References: <1D2B34A7-7BB9-4E4E-9CA2-382C210E125F@profihost.ag> <20110912152133.GA8345@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Stefan Priebe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com" , "xfs@oss.sgi.com" On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 06:46:26PM +0200, Stefan Priebe wrote: > > What kind of workload are you running? Also did the workload run fine > > with an older kernel, and if yes which one? > > Mysql, Web, Mail, ftp ;-) yes it was with 2.6.32. I upgraded from that version. Just curious, is this the same system that also shows the freezes reported to the scsi list? If I/Os don't get completed by lower layers I can see how we get everything in XFS waiting on the log reservations, given that we never get the log tail pushed. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs