From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Bartosz Cisek <bartosz.cisek@nasza-klasa.pl>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfs_repair segfaut in stage 6
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:38:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110914153852.GA11050@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E70C15C.3030502@nasza-klasa.pl>
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 04:59:40PM +0200, Bartosz Cisek wrote:
> Stack trace is pasted in bug issue [1] that is linked in first mail ;)
> Compiled by hand from git: "DEBUG=-DDEBUG make". I don't know why some
> of values are 'optimized out'.
>
> [1] http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=914
Looks like we do not handle read I/O errors very well (to say at all)
in phase6. Can you see if the patch below makes a difference?
---
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: repair: fix I/O error handling
Currently libxfs_trans_read_buf never returns an error, even if
libxfs_readbuf did not manage to complete the I/O. This is different
from the kernel behaviour and can lead to segfaults in code that
doesn't expect it. Add a new b_error member to xfs_buf (mirroring
the kernel version) and use that to propagate proper error codes
to the caller. Also fix libxfs_readbufr to handle short reads
properly, and to not override errno values e.g. by a fprintf.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Index: xfsprogs-dev/include/libxfs.h
===================================================================
--- xfsprogs-dev.orig/include/libxfs.h 2011-09-14 11:17:42.660738577 -0400
+++ xfsprogs-dev/include/libxfs.h 2011-09-14 11:20:45.959738580 -0400
@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_buf {
void *b_fsprivate2;
void *b_fsprivate3;
char *b_addr;
+ int b_error;
#ifdef XFS_BUF_TRACING
struct list_head b_lock_list;
const char *b_func;
Index: xfsprogs-dev/libxfs/rdwr.c
===================================================================
--- xfsprogs-dev.orig/libxfs/rdwr.c 2011-09-14 11:12:08.807741720 -0400
+++ xfsprogs-dev/libxfs/rdwr.c 2011-09-14 11:20:21.183238272 -0400
@@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ libxfs_initbuf(xfs_buf_t *bp, dev_t devi
bp->b_blkno = bno;
bp->b_bcount = bytes;
bp->b_dev = device;
+ bp->b_error = 0;
if (!bp->b_addr)
bp->b_addr = memalign(libxfs_device_alignment(), bytes);
if (!bp->b_addr) {
@@ -454,15 +455,17 @@ libxfs_readbufr(dev_t dev, xfs_daddr_t b
{
int fd = libxfs_device_to_fd(dev);
int bytes = BBTOB(len);
+ int error;
ASSERT(BBTOB(len) <= bp->b_bcount);
- if (pread64(fd, bp->b_addr, bytes, LIBXFS_BBTOOFF64(blkno)) < 0) {
+ if (pread64(fd, bp->b_addr, bytes, LIBXFS_BBTOOFF64(blkno)) != bytes) {
+ error = errno;
fprintf(stderr, _("%s: read failed: %s\n"),
- progname, strerror(errno));
+ progname, strerror(error));
if (flags & LIBXFS_EXIT_ON_FAILURE)
exit(1);
- return errno;
+ return error;
}
#ifdef IO_DEBUG
printf("%lx: %s: read %u bytes, blkno=%llu(%llu), %p\n",
@@ -485,10 +488,8 @@ libxfs_readbuf(dev_t dev, xfs_daddr_t bl
bp = libxfs_getbuf(dev, blkno, len);
if (bp && !(bp->b_flags & (LIBXFS_B_UPTODATE|LIBXFS_B_DIRTY))) {
error = libxfs_readbufr(dev, blkno, bp, len, flags);
- if (error) {
- libxfs_putbuf(bp);
- return NULL;
- }
+ if (error)
+ bp->b_error = error;
}
return bp;
}
Index: xfsprogs-dev/libxfs/trans.c
===================================================================
--- xfsprogs-dev.orig/libxfs/trans.c 2011-09-14 11:12:08.827738490 -0400
+++ xfsprogs-dev/libxfs/trans.c 2011-09-14 11:21:19.771739416 -0400
@@ -478,9 +478,20 @@ libxfs_trans_read_buf(
xfs_buf_log_item_t *bip;
xfs_buftarg_t bdev;
+ *bpp = NULL;
+
if (tp == NULL) {
- *bpp = libxfs_readbuf(dev, blkno, len, flags);
- return 0;
+ bp = libxfs_readbuf(dev, blkno, len, flags);
+ if (!bp) {
+ return (flags & XBF_TRYLOCK) ?
+ EAGAIN : XFS_ERROR(ENOMEM);
+ }
+ if (bp->b_error) {
+ int error = bp->b_error;
+ xfs_buf_relse(bp);
+ return error;
+ }
+ goto done;
}
bdev.dev = dev;
@@ -490,15 +501,20 @@ libxfs_trans_read_buf(
ASSERT(XFS_BUF_FSPRIVATE(bp, void *) != NULL);
bip = XFS_BUF_FSPRIVATE(bp, xfs_buf_log_item_t*);
bip->bli_recur++;
- *bpp = bp;
- return 0;
+ goto done;
}
bp = libxfs_readbuf(dev, blkno, len, flags);
- if (!bp){
- *bpp = NULL;
- return errno;
- }
+ if (!bp) {
+ return (flags & XBF_TRYLOCK) ?
+ EAGAIN : XFS_ERROR(ENOMEM);
+ }
+ if (bp->b_error) {
+ int error = bp->b_error;
+ xfs_buf_relse(bp);
+ return error;
+ }
+
#ifdef XACT_DEBUG
fprintf(stderr, "trans_read_buf buffer %p, transaction %p\n", bp, tp);
#endif
@@ -510,6 +526,8 @@ libxfs_trans_read_buf(
/* initialise b_fsprivate2 so we can find it incore */
XFS_BUF_SET_FSPRIVATE2(bp, tp);
+
+done:
*bpp = bp;
return 0;
}
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-14 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-09 8:43 xfs_repair segfaut in stage 6 Bartosz Cisek
2011-09-09 12:01 ` Michael Monnerie
2011-09-09 15:06 ` Bartosz Cisek
2011-09-12 15:42 ` Bartosz Cisek
2011-09-12 15:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-12 16:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-14 9:38 ` Bartosz Cisek
2011-09-14 14:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-14 14:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-09-14 15:10 ` Bartosz Cisek
2011-09-14 15:23 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-09-14 14:59 ` Bartosz Cisek
2011-09-14 15:38 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-09-14 16:05 ` Bartosz Cisek
2011-09-20 20:25 ` Alex Elder
2011-09-20 20:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-09 12:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110914153852.GA11050@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=bartosz.cisek@nasza-klasa.pl \
--cc=michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox