From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p8MGavll244029 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:36:58 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:36:55 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2][xfstests] Add test 257: Check proper FITRIM argument handling Message-ID: <20110922163655.GA627@infradead.org> References: <1315410523-23925-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Lukas Czerner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, aelder@sgi.com On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:37:32AM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > + # Btrfs is special and this test does not apply to it > > + if [ $bytes -le $(($fsize*512)) ] && [ $FSTYP != "btrfs" ]; then > > + status=1 > > + echo "It seems that fs logic handling len argument overflows" > > + fi > Care to explain why btrfs is "special"? Also I can't parse the sentence above in the echo line. > > > + export MKFS_OPTIONS=$backup_mkfs_options why backup? Otherwise this looks reasonable to me? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs