From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p96Jle14198216 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:47:40 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 5B0E116B768C for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:54:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id mQONXazSbZhQhsBg for ; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:54:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:47:38 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: make 258 more forgiving of timestamp rounding Message-ID: <20111006194738.GE13434@infradead.org> References: <4E89E851.80203@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E89E851.80203@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 11:52:33AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Rather than testing for an exact timestamp, which could vary > due to rounding, just check that it is not positive, > which is the failure case we're looking for. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs