From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p97KA3KU260284 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:10:03 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 16:10:01 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] xfs: remove xfs_buf_target_name Message-ID: <20111007201001.GA23256@infradead.org> References: <20111006210607.175284390@bombadil.infradead.org> <20111006210640.089607475@bombadil.infradead.org> <1318016243.2810.47.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1318016243.2810.47.camel@doink> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:37:23PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 17:06 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The calling convention that returns a pointer to a static buffer is > > fairly nasty, so just opencode it in the only caller that is left. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > Yay! The name buffer needs not to be static any more though. > I will remove it for you unless you want to re-post it. > > Other than that, looks good. I'll resping the series with this and the naming change. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs