public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: do not update xa_last_pushed_lsn for locked items
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:37:49 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111010013749.GR3159@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111006183549.399127499@bombadil.infradead.org>

On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 02:32:58PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> If an item was locked we should not update xa_last_pushed_lsn and thus skip
> it when restarting the AIL scan as we need to be able to lock and write it
> out as soon as possible.  Otherwise heavy lock contention might starve AIL
> pushing too easily, especially given the larger backoff once we moved
> xa_last_pushed_lsn all the way to the target lsn.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reported-by: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
> Tested-by: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-10  1:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-06 18:32 [PATCH 0/4] fix AIL pushing under heavy concurrent metadata loads Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-06 18:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: do not update xa_last_pushed_lsn for locked items Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-07 22:18   ` Alex Elder
2011-10-10  1:37   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-10-06 18:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: force the log if we encounter pinned buffers in .iop_pushbuf Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-07 22:18   ` Alex Elder
2011-10-10  1:39   ` Dave Chinner
2011-10-06 18:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: revert to using a kthread for AIL pushing Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-07 22:18   ` Alex Elder
2011-10-10  1:45   ` Dave Chinner
2011-10-10  5:55     ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-10-10  6:06       ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-10-10 13:26       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-10 18:37         ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 11:16       ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-10-19 11:34         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-19 13:10           ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-10-06 18:33 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: add AIL pushing tracepoints Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-07 22:18   ` Alex Elder
2011-10-10  1:45   ` Dave Chinner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-11 15:14 [PATCH 0/4] fix AIL pushing under heavy concurrent metadata loads V2 Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-11 15:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: do not update xa_last_pushed_lsn for locked items Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111010013749.GR3159@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox