public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] repair: fix some valgrind reported errors on i686
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:14:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111010131449.GA15671@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111010002017.GQ3159@dastard>

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:20:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Call me stupid, but I can't see how this could actually be a real
> > life issue.  The first thing we do in the loop is to to write
> > to fsbno in btree_find.  I'm fine adding this to shut up warnins,
> > but I can't see a real issue.
> 
> If btree_find() fails to find the key being looked up, it returns
> without having initialised fsbno.

Indeed.  The normal pattern for btree_find seems to be:

	obj = btree_find(tree, key, &key_ptr);
	if (!obj)
		return;

which makes this fine.

The code in pf_batch_read effectively boils down to that due to
the 

	while (bplist[num] && num < MAX_BUFS && fsbno < max_fsbno) {

loop which stops executing the first conditional that evaluated to
false.  So I can't see how this actually ever had an affect, but I'm
fine with fixing the warnings.

Btw, did I mention that the while loop over the bplist is completely
non-intuitive?

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-10 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-09 23:11 [PATCH 0/5, v2] repair: sector size and blkmap fixes Dave Chinner
2011-10-09 23:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] repair: handle repair of image files on large sector size filesystems Dave Chinner
2011-10-09 23:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-10  0:17     ` Dave Chinner
2011-10-10  0:19       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-09 23:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] repair: fix some valgrind reported errors on i686 Dave Chinner
2011-10-09 23:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-10  0:20     ` Dave Chinner
2011-10-10 13:14       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-10-09 23:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] repair: handle memory allocation failure from blkmap_grow Dave Chinner
2011-10-09 23:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-10  0:10     ` Dave Chinner
2011-10-09 23:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] repair: don't cache large blkmap allocations Dave Chinner
2011-10-09 23:48   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-10  0:14     ` Dave Chinner
2011-10-10 13:22       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-09 23:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] repair: prevent blkmap extent count overflows Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111010131449.GA15671@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox