From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p9AEFjVL181907 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:15:46 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 06E881F1F3D0 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:15:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id KYjeZEG5Zkl4MSWx for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:15:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:15:43 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] repair: don't cache large blkmap allocations Message-ID: <20111010141542.GD31429@infradead.org> References: <1318208915-14975-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1318208915-14975-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1318208915-14975-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Looks reasonable. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Although as said my gut feeling is that the cutoff should be lower. We'd probably need measurements to decide where to go. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs