From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p9AEIQjd182012 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:18:26 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 9CD50145BFD6 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:25:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 4A407jYp5g4lvHHa for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:25:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:18:25 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5, v3] repair: sector size and blkmap fixes Message-ID: <20111010141825.GF31429@infradead.org> References: <1318208915-14975-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1318208915-14975-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Any chance we can get some coverage for the losts of extents cases in xfstests? It will probably require pre-created images, but I'd really hate not beeing able to regression test this. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs