From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p9BMavBc025467 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:36:57 -0500 Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 1A6E71BD840 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id BsB3lrykcxS8nByJ for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:36:54 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfstests: fix 122 for recent xfsprogs Message-ID: <20111011223654.GF3159@dastard> References: <20111010182156.GA1323@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111010182156.GA1323@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 02:21:56PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > - filter out xfs_alloctype_t, this was an internal emum that got removed > - filter out xfs_bmbt_rec_32_t, this is a variant of the xfs_bmbt_rec_t > that had almost no users and was removed > - filter out xfs_dinode_core_t, the separate dinode core is gone, and just > checking the size of the full dinode is enough > - accept xfs_bmbt_rec_t as the new canonical name for xfs_bmbt_rec_64_t, > and replace the old name with the new one in the output stream. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs