From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p9C7Wcnd047110 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:32:40 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 213F714646A5 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id skSIA2EhZkFKusSk for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 03:32:32 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfstests: split mapped writes vs direct I/O tests from 091 Message-ID: <20111012073232.GB5071@infradead.org> References: <20111010182156.GA1323@infradead.org> <20111010182216.GA1335@infradead.org> <20111011224010.GG3159@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111011224010.GG3159@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:40:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > +# creator > > +owner=nathans@sgi.com > > No point keeping an invalid email address as the owner of a new > test. > > FWIW, I'm considering removing this from the tests as the > information is in the commit history, and the use of the field > (emailing the owner when the automated test infrastructure SGI used > 10 years ago failed) is no longer used... We should really just kill it. If anyone runs the test automated again he should get the mails and/or cc the xfs lists. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs