public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Help with xfs and Fedora 8
@ 2011-10-12  1:23 Ram Natarajan
  2011-10-12 23:14 ` Dave Chinner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ram Natarajan @ 2011-10-12  1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xfs


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 963 bytes --]

I have a bunch of Fedora 8 machines running Kernel 2.6.23.1.
I am noticing that the xfs partitions on these machines 'freeze up' once in
a while. I have  to manually run xfs_repair on these partitions to get them
going again. Note that SMART does not report any hard disk errors - these
are purely xfs related. I also see some xfs kernel module messages in the
kernel logs. My question is this:
Can I move to the latest xfs by recompiling xfs kernel module and xfs
support code for 2.6.23. For various technical reasons, I cannot move to a
later kernel, but it would be great if I can build the latest xfs modules
and xfs support code for 2.6.23. Does anybody know if this is possible, and
if it is possible, will it work reliably?
Thanks,
Ram

-- 
This message may contain confidential information for the exclusive use of
intended addressee. If you are not the addressee, could you please delete
the mail and attachments from your system and inform the sender?

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1018 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Help with xfs and Fedora 8
  2011-10-12  1:23 Help with xfs and Fedora 8 Ram Natarajan
@ 2011-10-12 23:14 ` Dave Chinner
  2011-10-13 10:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2011-10-12 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ram Natarajan; +Cc: xfs

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 06:23:41PM -0700, Ram Natarajan wrote:
> I have a bunch of Fedora 8 machines running Kernel 2.6.23.1.
> I am noticing that the xfs partitions on these machines 'freeze up' once in
> a while. I have  to manually run xfs_repair on these partitions to get them
> going again. Note that SMART does not report any hard disk errors - these
> are purely xfs related. I also see some xfs kernel module messages in the
> kernel logs. My question is this:
> Can I move to the latest xfs by recompiling xfs kernel module and xfs
> support code for 2.6.23.

The userspace code (xfsprogs, etc) is simple - just download the
latest and compile it.

>
> For various technical reasons, I cannot move to a
> later kernel, but it would be great if I can build the latest xfs modules
> and xfs support code for 2.6.23. Does anybody know if this is possible, and
> if it is possible, will it work reliably?

The kernel code is not so simple. Indeed, if you're not a kernel
programmer and familiar with the XFS code, then I'd put it in the
impossible basket. It'll take at least 3 months to do the backport
and adequately test it for production use, and that's if you pay an
expert to do it.

It's far, far simpler to just upgrade your machines to a more recent
distribution that it is to backport code to kernels that old....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Help with xfs and Fedora 8
  2011-10-12 23:14 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2011-10-13 10:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2011-10-13 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: Ram Natarajan, xfs

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:14:24AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > For various technical reasons, I cannot move to a
> > later kernel, but it would be great if I can build the latest xfs modules
> > and xfs support code for 2.6.23. Does anybody know if this is possible, and
> > if it is possible, will it work reliably?
> 
> The kernel code is not so simple. Indeed, if you're not a kernel
> programmer and familiar with the XFS code, then I'd put it in the
> impossible basket. It'll take at least 3 months to do the backport
> and adequately test it for production use, and that's if you pay an
> expert to do it.
> 
> It's far, far simpler to just upgrade your machines to a more recent
> distribution that it is to backport code to kernels that old....

Indeed.  If you insist on an old kernel version with a semi recent XFS
please get a RHEL/Centos 5 kernel.  That one is actually labelled 2.6.18
but contains many fixes and updated components, including a relatively
new XFS codebase.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-13 10:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-12  1:23 Help with xfs and Fedora 8 Ram Natarajan
2011-10-12 23:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-10-13 10:35   ` Christoph Hellwig

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox