From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p9EChBes261099 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:43:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:43:09 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH,v2] xfstests: prepare for marking an initial versioned release Message-ID: <20111014124309.GB6842@infradead.org> References: <201110131631.p9DGV4oE002216@stout.americas.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201110131631.p9DGV4oE002216@stout.americas.sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:31:04AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > The following adds the release script used in the other XFS user > space packages. The version is arbitrarily set to 3.0.0, aligning > it roughly with the current version of the Linux kernel as well as > to the other XFS user space packages. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Elder Fine with me, although with the current state of affairs 0.1 really seems like a much more fitting version number. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs