From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p9HCPOKJ259661 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:25:24 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id B7E961C90B3D for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 05:25:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id QrDJEuxIB7ctzT4P for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 05:25:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9HCPM11025253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:25:22 -0400 Received: from andromeda.usersys.redhat.com ([10.3.113.8]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9HCPJ6x013222 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:25:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:24:12 -0200 From: Carlos Maiolino Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Fix possible memory corruption in xfs_readlink Message-ID: <20111017122412.GA32608@andromeda.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20111016234121.GS3159@dastard> <1318863168-3187-1-git-send-email-cmaiolino@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1318863168-3187-1-git-send-email-cmaiolino@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi, On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:52:48PM -0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > This patch fix a possible memory corruption when > the link is larger than MAXPATHLEN and XFS_DEBUG > is not enabled. This also uses S_IFLNK to check > link not only in DEBUG mode. > please, disconsider this last patch. I did two mistakes here and I'll be sending a fixed version of it. My apologies for this -- --Carlos _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs