* xfs_symlink problem? 3.1 after rc10
@ 2011-10-24 9:48 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-24 12:27 ` Carlos Maiolino
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz @ 2011-10-24 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
My 3.1 (after) rc10 crashed (there was no xfs changes after it afaik).
Could anyone verify that this isn't some nasty xfs problem since it's close to
final 3.1? Happened only once.
http://ixion.pld-linux.org/~arekm/IMG_6019.JPG
No quota was used, xfs on top of luks on top of ssd drive.
--
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_symlink problem? 3.1 after rc10
2011-10-24 9:48 xfs_symlink problem? 3.1 after rc10 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
@ 2011-10-24 12:27 ` Carlos Maiolino
2011-10-24 13:40 ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Maiolino @ 2011-10-24 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz; +Cc: xfs
> My 3.1 (after) rc10 crashed (there was no xfs changes after it afaik).
>
> Could anyone verify that this isn't some nasty xfs problem since it's close to
> final 3.1? Happened only once.
>
> http://ixion.pld-linux.org/~arekm/IMG_6019.JPG
>
> No quota was used, xfs on top of luks on top of ssd drive.
It looks to be caused by a general protection fault, and giving the place where this crashed
I would say this sounds like the bug I've fixed some days ago related with the size of the
symlinks.
I can be wrong though, and this is related with another problem.
--
--Carlos
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_symlink problem? 3.1 after rc10
2011-10-24 12:27 ` Carlos Maiolino
@ 2011-10-24 13:40 ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-24 14:13 ` Carlos Maiolino
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz @ 2011-10-24 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Maiolino; +Cc: xfs
On Monday 24 of October 2011, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > My 3.1 (after) rc10 crashed (there was no xfs changes after it afaik).
> >
> > Could anyone verify that this isn't some nasty xfs problem since it's
> > close to final 3.1? Happened only once.
> >
> > http://ixion.pld-linux.org/~arekm/IMG_6019.JPG
> >
> > No quota was used, xfs on top of luks on top of ssd drive.
>
> It looks to be caused by a general protection fault, and giving the place
It happened again:
http://ixion.pld-linux.org/~arekm/100_5434.JPG
http://ixion.pld-linux.org/~arekm/100_5433.JPG
> where this crashed I would say this sounds like the bug I've fixed some
> days ago related with the size of the symlinks.
> I can be wrong though, and this is related with another problem.
The weird thing is that I never ever hit this before with pre 3.1rc10 git
kernels. Was your bugfix a fix for new issue that was introduced in 3.1 cycle
or for something old?
--
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_symlink problem? 3.1 after rc10
2011-10-24 13:40 ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
@ 2011-10-24 14:13 ` Carlos Maiolino
2011-10-24 21:30 ` xfs_symlink problem? [Allow pquota and gquota to be used together actually] Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Maiolino @ 2011-10-24 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz; +Cc: xfs
> It happened again:
>
> http://ixion.pld-linux.org/~arekm/100_5434.JPG
> http://ixion.pld-linux.org/~arekm/100_5433.JPG
>
> The weird thing is that I never ever hit this before with pre 3.1rc10 git
> kernels. Was your bugfix a fix for new issue that was introduced in 3.1 cycle
> or for something old?
>
Hmm, sorry, my mistake here, I fixed a problem on xfs_readlink, not at xfs_symlink.
Although, by your last screenshots, it doesn't look to be related with the problem
I was working before.
On all screenshots the system is crashing while trying to acquire a mutex lock, I don't
know much about the code path where the crash is happening, but, maybe if you enable
CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG we can get some extra hints about where the system is crashing? Also,
have you fsck'ed this FS? maybe an `xfs_repair -nv` would give any clue if there is any
corrupted metadata which would cause this error
--
--Carlos
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-25 6:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-24 9:48 xfs_symlink problem? 3.1 after rc10 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-24 12:27 ` Carlos Maiolino
2011-10-24 13:40 ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-24 14:13 ` Carlos Maiolino
2011-10-24 21:30 ` xfs_symlink problem? [Allow pquota and gquota to be used together actually] Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
