* Re: writeback tree status (for 3.2 merge window) [not found] <20111101074347.GA23644@localhost> @ 2011-11-02 9:10 ` Christoph Hellwig 2011-11-02 15:13 ` Wu Fengguang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2011-11-02 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wu Fengguang Cc: Michael Rubin, Jan Kara, Peter Zijlstra, Andrea Righi, LKML, Curt Wohlgemuth, linux-mm, Minchan Kim, Tang Feng, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Thelen, Andrew Morton, xfs, Linus Torvalds, Christoph Hellwig, Vivek Goyal On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 03:43:47PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > Hi, > > There are 3 patchsets sitting in the writeback tree. > > 1) IO-less dirty throttling v12 > https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/dirty-throttling-v12 > > 2) writeback reasons tracing from Curt Wohlgemuth > https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/writeback-reason > > 3) writeback queuing changes from Jan Kara and me > https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/requeue-io-wait > > They have been merged into this branch testing in linux-next for a while: > > https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/writeback-for-next > > Since (3) still has an unresolved issue (detailed in the below > links), it looks better to hold it back for this merge window. Given that we have run into issues so much with it that's proably the better idea. To fix the originally reported issue with the missing file size updates in XFS we plan to simply log all filesize changes in XFS. Currently I had this in the 3.3 queue, but in the worst case we might have to move this forward to 3.2. > The patches from (1,2) together with 2 tracing patches essential for > debugging (1) have been pushed to the "writeback-for-linus" branch: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/wfg/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/writeback-for-linus > > If no objections, I'll send a pull request to Linus soon. Please do so. I'm really looking forward to see the I/O-less balance_dirty_pages in ASAP. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: writeback tree status (for 3.2 merge window) 2011-11-02 9:10 ` writeback tree status (for 3.2 merge window) Christoph Hellwig @ 2011-11-02 15:13 ` Wu Fengguang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Wu Fengguang @ 2011-11-02 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Michael Rubin, Jan Kara, Peter Zijlstra, Andrea Righi, LKML, Curt Wohlgemuth, linux-mm, Minchan Kim, Tang Feng, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Thelen, Andrew Morton, xfs, Linus Torvalds, Christoph Hellwig, Vivek Goyal On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 05:10:12AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 03:43:47PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There are 3 patchsets sitting in the writeback tree. > > > > 1) IO-less dirty throttling v12 > > https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/dirty-throttling-v12 > > > > 2) writeback reasons tracing from Curt Wohlgemuth > > https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/writeback-reason > > > > 3) writeback queuing changes from Jan Kara and me > > https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/requeue-io-wait > > > > They have been merged into this branch testing in linux-next for a while: > > > > https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/writeback-for-next > > > > Since (3) still has an unresolved issue (detailed in the below > > links), it looks better to hold it back for this merge window. > > Given that we have run into issues so much with it that's proably > the better idea. > > To fix the originally reported issue with the missing file size updates > in XFS we plan to simply log all filesize changes in XFS. Currently I > had this in the 3.3 queue, but in the worst case we might have to move > this forward to 3.2. OK. Anyway I'll report any progress early on (3). > > The patches from (1,2) together with 2 tracing patches essential for > > debugging (1) have been pushed to the "writeback-for-linus" branch: > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/wfg/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/writeback-for-linus > > > > If no objections, I'll send a pull request to Linus soon. > > Please do so. I'm really looking forward to see the I/O-less > balance_dirty_pages in ASAP. Done, thanks! Thanks, Fengguang _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-02 15:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20111101074347.GA23644@localhost>
2011-11-02 9:10 ` writeback tree status (for 3.2 merge window) Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-02 15:13 ` Wu Fengguang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox